The only problem is, the reasons these guitars never caught on in the first place were not just about fiddly switches – they were about tone. Fashion is one thing, but if they don’t sound as good as Teles or Strats then who needs ’em?
Well, that’s where the arguments begin. Offsets have a sweetness all their own but they can sound a little scratchy, and in standard spec they’re generally not big sustainers – so for a certain kind of ‘traditional’ rock playing they’re never going to be the tonehound’s axe of choice.
This is mostly down to the combination of a pivoting bridge and a shallow string-break angle over the saddles: a recipe for dismally inefficient transfer of vibrations between strings and body. And when those saddles are threaded instead of notched, making the strings prone to popping out of position at the lightest strum, it’s easy to see why so many people have leapt straight back into the arms of the low-maintenance Tele. The vibrato arm is only good for a semitone or so, and can sometimes cause the bridge to get stuck in mid-pivot. Oh, and don’t forget the problem of the strings resonating annoyingly behind the bridge when you’re trying not to play…
The other thing that made it hard for the offset models to bounce back to prominence before now is that, despite the appearance of occasional new models like the Jag-Stang and Cyclone, they were never modernised like Fender’s other guitars. Until recently, if you wanted a Jazzmaster, you were pretty much stuck with one kind of pickup, one kind of bridge (see above) and one fretboard radius – a tight one that turns string-bending with a low action into a festival of choking-out.